The following excerpt is from Marble Tile & Terrazzo Union, Local 31 v Labourers' International Union of North America, 2017 CanLII 51528 (ON LRB):
4. The responding party objects to the filing of the Aug. 2 Particulars. Among other things, the applicant states that it has outstanding motions to argue asserting that the applications should be dismissed on a prima facie basis. The responding party also asserts that the applicant is confined to the applications as originally filed and cannot rely on the Aug. 2 Particulars when defending those prima facie motions and relies for this proposition on LP Masonry v. BMIU, Local 1, [2012] OLRD No. 4272 at para. 12.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.