The principle to be derived from the authorities is that if a landlord distrains and changes the locks they must do so properly or the change of the locks will be found to terminate the lease. A lock change is justified if the premises have been abandoned. Whether the changing of the locks constitutes an election by the landlord to terminate the lease will depend on the particular circumstances of the case. In some cases, courts have found that changing the locks did not terminate the lease because the tenant was offered continuing access or a new set of keys. Moreover, the onus is on the landlord to show it executed the distress properly and lawfully: Gooch v. Song, 2010 BCPC 79 at para. 267.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.