I find, as a fact, and in accordance with the law laid down in Keefer v. Arillotta, supra, that the Plaintiffs failed to establish an “intention to exclude” as a requisite to “exclusive possession or animus possidendi, with clear and cogent evidence, based on the actual use which was made, or intended to be made, by themselves, or their predecessors on title.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.