As noted, the defence of justification turns on the sting of the impugned statement and whether it would have a different effect on a reader than the truth; see also Jay v. Hollinger Canadian Newspapers, 2002 BCSC 1655 at para. 53, where McEwan J. stated that justification can only be assessed by comparing the sting of the published words with the effect of the actual facts.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.