What is the standard for a judicial review of a penalty imposed by a professional body?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Becker v. College of Pharmacists of Manitoba, 2016 MBQB 105 (CanLII):
Judicial review of a penalty imposed by a professional body on one of its members is conducted on a standard of reasonableness. Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190, directs that:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the judicial review process? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for judicial review of administrative decisions? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness in a judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a breach of the duty of procedural fairness reviewed on a reasonableness standard? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is section 8(1) of the 2019 Decision barred judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeals from support orders? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and the inferences drawn by her? (Manitoba, Canada)
What standard of review applies to a question of law, fact and inference? (Manitoba, Canada)
