Is it inappropriate to make an award for services that a plaintiff has not used in the past or is unlikely to use in the future?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tomas v Sticha, 2019 BCSC 1204 (CanLII):

I also agree that it is inappropriate to make an award for services that a plaintiff has not used in the past or is unlikely to use in the future. In this regard, see Izony v. Weidlich, 2006 BCSC 1315 at para. 74.

Other Questions


If a plaintiff has not used a particular item or service in the past, is it inappropriate to include its cost in the future care award? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff’s future care cost of future care award? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award where they have not used a particular service in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has not used an item of service in the past, is it appropriate to include that cost in the future cost award? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will a court award a cost of future care award for a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award for the purposes of calculating future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating future care costs for a plaintiff who has not used a particular service or product in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be awarded damages for loss of future earning capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a "in trust" award for the services rendered by the victim's wife in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.