The following excerpt is from Pacer Constr. Holdings Corp. v. Pelletier, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01263-MMA-BGS (S.D. Cal. 2020):
A district court "should defer to the winning lawyer's professional judgment as to how much time he was required to spend on the case." Chaudhry, 751 F.3d at 1111 (citing Moreno v. City of Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106, 1112 (9th Cir. 2008)). "[T]rial courts must carefully review attorney documentation of hours expended; 'padding' in the form of inefficient or duplicative efforts is not subject to compensation." Ketchum, 17 P.3d at 741.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.