Is there sufficient evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Dewey, 9 F.3d 1554 (9th Cir. 1993):
We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Bishop, 959 F.2d 820, 829 (9th Cir.1992).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is sufficient evidence to support a conviction if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If there is an error in the finding that a defendant is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of reasonable doubt, is that error harmless beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal court have to be satisfied that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a rational trier of fact find that the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a rational trier of fact find the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could not have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining that a rational trier of fact could not have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is sufficient to support a conviction if any rational juror could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a judgment of acquittal if no rational trier of fact found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a jury or trier of fact could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
