California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Stoffle, 1 Cal.App.4th 1671, 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 257 (Cal. App. 1991):
There is no requirement under federal search and seizure law that an auto search incident to an occupant's arrest must have some nexus between the item to be seized and the crime for which the occupant was arrested. Indeed, one of the rationales for the search-incident-to-arrest exception is the safety of the arresting officer. This rationale is dependent upon the mere fact of a custodial arrest rather than the nature of the offense comprising the arrest. (See United States v. Robinson (1973) 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427.)
Page 264
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.