The following excerpt is from United States v. Doe, 705 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2013):
3. Doe did object to the district court's decision not to instruct that the government bore the burden beyond a reasonable doubt, but that is a different objection and is not enough to preserve the current issue. See United States v. Kessi, 868 F.2d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir.1989) (objecting to an instruction generally and to a different part of that instruction specifically does not satisfy preservation of an objection to another part of that instruction).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.