Is there any legal error or error in requiring a party to act under a requirement four in a murder case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Soria, B275214 (Cal. App. 2018):
Soria claims this italicized requirement four is legal error. Yet People v. Trevino (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 874, 879 held "an instruction which states that the party killing must act under the influence of such fears alone, is a correct statement of the law."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a cumulative effect of errors resulting in errors requiring reversal require reversal? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.2(a)(2) of the California Criminal Code require a separate multiple-murder special circumstance to be attached to each murder conviction sustained in the capital case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court's error in instructing the jury that a jury need not agree whether Defendant Committed a Premeditated Murder or Lying-in-wait Murder require reversal? (California, United States of America)
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a judge made an error or error in making required findings? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
In a capital murder case, in what circumstances will the California Supreme Court order that a juror should not submit a questionnaire for the purpose of selecting a jury in capital murder cases? (California, United States of America)
Can the felony-murder rule be applied to a charge of assault and murder in a case where appellant entered the home with intent to commit assault or murder? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a murder by torture by torture is not murder by means of physical evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
