The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sanders, 988 F.2d 125 (9th Cir. 1993):
Finally, Sanders contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because (1) the evidence was seized pursuant to an unlawful, warrantless search of sealed containers, and (2) the warrant was overbroad. However, Sanders failed to raise these grounds in support of his motion to suppress and we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. United States v. Restrepo-Rua, 815 F.2d 1327, 1329 (9th Cir.1987).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.