Is there any grounds for reversing a court's decision to exclude evidence that supports a claim of sexual assault?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Savoy, A132866 (Cal. App. 2013):
Accordingly, there are no grounds for reversing the trial court's decision to exclude this evidence, particularly when we consider this evidence, as we must, in a light most favorable to affirming. (See People v. Pelayo (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 115, 120-121
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, what is the test for a plaintiff's claim that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have abused its power to exclude evidence that supports a claim of malice in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 352 of the California Evidence Code for excluding prejudicial evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
