Is there any case law which supports the argument that the testimony of two witnesses to a murder trial would have been sufficient to convict the accused of the crime?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ramirez v. Yates, 2: 10 - cv - 1417 - MCE TJB (E.D. Cal. 2012):
1987); and that their testimony would have been sufficient to create a reasonable doubt as to guilt. See Tinsley v. Borg, 895 F.2d 520, 532 (9th Cir. 1990).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When determining the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence in a murder trial, is the evidence sufficient to convict the accused of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of evidentiary support for a conviction for sexual assault, is the evidence sufficient to support the conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a jury convicted Driggers of the murder of his ex-wife by reason of interstate travel, can the jury convict him of the crime even if the interstate travel was utterly unrelated to the murder scheme? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any evidence to support a finding that a continuance of a trial would have been inconvenience to the trial of a bank witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting the argument that a conviction for a violent crime committed by a convicted felon is a form of a felony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been convicted of a drug-fuelled murder and convicted of the crime because the prosecution relied heavily on circumstantial evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for severing a trial of a defendant who contends that a co-defendant would offer exculpatory testimony at a separate trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Government have any case law that supports its argument that "the same analysis applies whether the witness is an expert or a lay witness"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant challenge his conviction for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by challenging the sufficiency of evidence to support his conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
