Is there any case law where the Attorney General has identified two discrepancies between the pronouncement of sentence and the abstract of judgment?

Finally, the People have identified two discrepancies between the court's oral pronouncement of sentence and the abstract of judgment. "[W]here, as here, the Attorney General identifies an evident discrepancy between the abstract of judgment and the judgment that the reporter's transcript and the trial court's minute order reflect, the appellate court itself should order the trial court to correct the abstract of judgment." (People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 188.)