The following excerpt is from United States v. Cox, 963 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2020):
44 See Romero , 282 F.3d at 688 (observing that the third prong of our Rule 404(b) test is a "low threshold").
45 United States v. Banks , 514 F.3d 959, 976 (9th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted).
46 United States v. Flores-Blanco , 623 F.3d 912, 919 n.3 (9th Cir. 2010).
47 See United States v. LeMay , 260 F.3d 1018, 102730 (9th Cir. 2001) (concluding that evidence of defendants prior acts of child molestation, admitted under Federal Rule of Evidence 414, did not need to be excluded under Rule 403 ).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.