Is there any case law where a prosecutor properly told a jury that mitigation was a factor in aggravation rather than aggravation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hamilton, 259 Cal.Rptr. 701, 48 Cal.3d 1142, 774 P.2d 730 (Cal. 1989):
24 In People v. Howard, supra, 44 Cal.3d 375, 435, 243 Cal.Rptr. 842, 749 P.2d 279, we noted with approval that the prosecutor properly informed the jury that "you don't count the number of items or the factors in mitigation and say that there were three or four or eight or ten and only one in aggravation, or the other way around."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a trial court be required to identify a particular sentencing factor as an aggravating or mitigating factor? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's Special Instruction No. 3 required to inform the jury that it is free to select a sentence of life without parole even if the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury find that a prosecutor's comment that a victim consented to the crime was not an aggravating factor under section 190.3 aggravation be harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument that the absence of specific mitigating factors constitute aggravation constitute prosecutorial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the absence of a mitigating factor constitutes an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 190.3(1) of the California Criminal Code when determining aggravation and mitigation factors in aggravation? (California, United States of America)
Does the instruction in section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code specify which of the factors aggravating and mitigating are aggravating? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted age as an aggravating or mitigating factor in sentencing factors? (California, United States of America)
