The following excerpt is from Black v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 119 F.3d 5 (9th Cir. 1997):
Black's first assignment of error is not really an error, as no reversible problem arises even if a district court adopts a party's proposed findings of fact "verbatim." Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 571-72 (1985). In any event, here it is obvious that the magistrate judge's 10-page supplemental findings are his own.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.