Is there any case law where a jury has concluded that a witness has a reasonable chance of proving that the witness is a reasonable witness?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Watts, 76 Cal.App.4th 1250, 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (Cal. App. 1999):
(1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 43, 54, 270 Cal.Rptr. 369.) It also is true that uncertainties or discrepancies in witnesses' testimony raise only evidentiary issues that are for the jury to resolve. (People v. Glaude (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 633, 641, 190 Cal.Rptr. 479.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a Defendant has made a reasonable and reasonable offer under section 998 of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances can a reasonable person reasonably conclude that she was in custody? (California, United States of America)
Can a witness be admitted as a witness at a preliminary hearing where the witness is in a state hospital? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving all the elements of a crime have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the power to ask a witness if they have evidence that the witness is not a witness? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does a witness who disowns his out-of-court identification have an opportunity to question the witness on the witness stand? (California, United States of America)
What is a reasonable inference for a judge to conclude that a person who has not been convicted of a crime has committed a crime by way of reasoning? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction that a jury would not convict appellant of a charge of sexual assault simply because they concluded beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
