Is there any case law where a jury has been instructed on accomplice testimony?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Labeaux, B279218 (Cal. App. 2017):
determination and, in that situation, need not instruct the jury on accomplice testimony.' [Citation.]" (People v. Gonzales (2011) 52 Cal.4th 254, 302 (Gonzales).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have instructions been interpreted in a sexual assault case where a jury was instructed to give considerable weight to the testimony of an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
When an accomplice is called as a witness by the prosecution, is the jury required to distrust the testimony of their accomplice's testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for error in instructing the jury that it could not convict a defendant on the testimony of an accomplice at the guilt phase of a trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have to grant immunity to a witness who testified in a witness testimony that the testimony was inconsistent with the instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have a sua sponte obligation to instruct the jury on the need for corroboration to support the testimony of an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on accomplice testimony harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to be instructed that an accomplice's testimony regarding the circumstances of a crime of previous crime must be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to be instructed that an accomplice's testimony regarding the circumstances of a crime of previous crime must be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
Does the instruction that the jury was to follow the instructions if an attorney's comments appeared to be in conflict with the instructions apply? (California, United States of America)
