The following excerpt is from Halverson v. Rolf, 868 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1989):
Whether the evidence establishes beyond a reasonable doubt an intent to kill necessary to support premeditated murder and whether intoxication evidence creates a reasonable doubt about intent present difficult questions. We review the sequence preceding the homicide together with the defendant's state of mind. Bowen v. Kemp, 832 F.2d 546, 551 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 1247 (1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.