Is there any case law in which a judge has found no errors or errors?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Greer, B287247, B292043 (Cal. App. 2019):
Greer argues that, even if the purported errors were individually harmless, when viewed in combination they were prejudicial, requiring reversal. But "[b]ecause we have found no error, there is no cumulative prejudice to evaluate." (People v. Lopez (2018) 5 Cal.5th 339, 371.)
Page 27
The judgment is affirmed. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where a judge has found that a trial judge made a "minor error" in making decisions in a trial? (California, United States of America)
Is there any jurisdictional error or error in making a temporary judge acting as temporary judge? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of an error in a judge's judgment in a case where the error was found to be prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
What are some cases where a judge has been found to be in error? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a judge has found that a sentence based on cumulative errors or cumulative prejudice? (California, United States of America)
When a trial judge has found under Pen. Code 667.6, subdivision (d), that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions, that they were committed at the same time, can the judge reverse? (California, United States of America)
Can a trial judge grant a continuance for good cause even if a decision by the supervising or presiding judge was in error? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a judge has been found to have made a single error on a Marsden motion? (California, United States of America)
