The following excerpt is from Fuchsberg, Matter of, 426 N.Y.S.2d 639 (N.Y. Ct. Jud. 1978):
The majority note that in Sgaglione v. Levitt, 37 N.Y.2d 507, 375 N.Y.S.2d 79, 337 N.E.2d 592 respondent voted against his apparent interest. That assumes that his participation in the case was with foreknowledge of his vote. Even so, the result does not alter the manifest impropriety of his participation in a case which would
Page 663
Then there were the Wein cases.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.