The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Santiago, 884 F.2d 1396 (9th Cir. 1989):
Santiago contends that the district court committed reversible error by failing to consider all the evidence in the case. The district judge indicated that he would not watch all the videotapes which were admitted into evidence, and requested that the parties play in open court whatever portions they wanted him see. Defense counsel made no objection. Thus, any objection is waived absent a showing of plain error. United States v. Rogers, 769 F.2d 1418, 1425 (9th Cir.1985) (Rogers ). Santiago does not make such a showing.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.