So we have to consider: (1) Was what is “incontrovertibly contributory negligence” admitted, or so clearly proved in the appellants’ own case that it would be proper to direct a jury to find it; (2) Is there evidence of circumstances which wholly excuse the appellants’ omission to look; or, as Street, J., puts it in Champaigne v. G.T. Ry., supra, “was there a reasonable excuse given” for the omission to look?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.