The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Gore, 154 F.3d 34 (2nd Cir. 1998):
4 Two of our cases have addressed the "merger" issue in dicta. In United States v. Jones, 779 F.2d 121 (2d Cir.1985), a case involving convictions for both distribution of heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute it, we noted in dicta that there was no merger problem "since the possession count related to heroin other than that involved in the sale count." Id. at 122.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.