Is the victim's statement admissible under the hearsay rule?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Nava, F065082, F068148 (Cal. App. 2014):

As the victim's statement was admissible under at least one exception to the hearsay rule, the trial court's admission of the evidence must be upheld. (People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 892, 901 ["If a judgment rests on admissible evidence it will not be reversed because the trial court admitted that evidence upon a different theory, a mistaken theory, or one not raised below"].)

Other Questions


When a defendant has adopted a statement as his own as an adoptive admission, is that statement admissible under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Is there an exception to the hearsay rule where a victim's out-of-court statements reflect the victim's "then existing state of mind"? (California, United States of America)
Can a Defendant challenge a finding that the victim's statements to police officers were admissible as prior inconsistent statements? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found admissible under the hearsay rule under the state of mind exception to hearsay? (California, United States of America)
Is a statement of abuse an adoptive admission for abuse of children an exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial witness's deliberate forgetfulness result in the admission of a statement made by a witness that is inconsistent with the hearsay rule or confrontation clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible statements under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible statements under the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a party's out-of-court statement qualify under the party admissions exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence of inconsistent statements under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.