That brings me to the second question: Was the under-employment reasonable? If, as it appears, the father is travelling for pleasure, then a court may consider that to be the kind of intentional under-employment that attracts imputation of his normal income, bearing in mind the general rule as formulated in Donovan [Donovan v. Donovan (2000), 190 D.L.R. (4th) 696, 2000 MBCA 80] that “a parent cannot avoid child support obligations by a self-induced reduction of income”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.