Some evidence in argument was directed to the question of whether some printing equipment which the respondent had in the basement of the home is a family asset. He said he used it as a hobby, but he conceded that from time to time he earned income from it. I do not think the fact that he earns income from a hobby and devotes that income to family purposes makes the hobby equipment itself a family asset. This is not a case such as Pongracz v. Pongracz, B.C.S.C., Houghton L.J.S.C, 9th June 1980 (not yet reported), where the hobby itself was shared by the family. I hold the printing equipment not to be a family asset.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.