The following excerpt is from Demuniz v. Oregon Parole Bd., 21 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 1994):
We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a petition for habeas corpus on the ground that it is successive or abusive. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 18-19 (1963); Neuschafer v. Whitley, 860 F.2d 1470, 1474 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 906 (1989).
Is the Petition Successive?
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.