How have the accused waived time periods to delay a second trial date?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Lind, 2007 BCPC 196 (CanLII):
The methodology I must observe and the factors which I am to consider in the order recommended in Regina v. Morin at p. 10, 17 et. seq. and as per step one of the test in Morin requires me first to consider waiver of time periods. It was not suggested by either counsel before me that the accused waived any relevant time period with respect to the application before me. I find none. I will deal with the delay to the second trial date below under the actions of the accused.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the value of a plaintiff's income for the period between the time of trial and the date of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a police officer have a duty on the accused to advise the accused of a criminal offence of not seeking counsel for a second time when new circumstances arise indicating that the accused is a suspect for a different crime than was the first warning? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for using a valuation date other than the trial date? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for setting a trial date for adding a party to the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have real property been valued at the date of trial rather than at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
In dealing with an application to change the venue of a trial, can the court change the date or venue of the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is excusability for a lawyer to delay or delay a trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant period of time between the date of the Accident and the time of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balance of convenience between the date of trial and the location of the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
