Is section 1161a(b) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure sufficient to compel a judge to interpret the meaning of the law in its entirety?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Ctr., 241 Cal.Rptr.3d 12, 431 P.3d 151, 6 Cal.5th 474 (Cal. 2018):
That reading, moreover, is confirmed by consideration of the broader context in which section 1161a(b) was enacted. (See, e.g., People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1008, 239 Cal.Rptr. 656, 741 P.2d 154 ["When the [statutory] language is susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation, ... we look to a variety of extrinsic aids, including the ostensible
[6 Cal.5th 481]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 31103 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the interpretation of the Section 31103 section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure requiring a cap on the amount of cannabis that can be confiscated? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any authority or authority to amend or amend a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure to make it easier for a plaintiff to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
