California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Valdez, E065045 (Cal. App. 2016):
Thus, there are at least three plausible reasons to single out receipt of a stolen motor vehicle from receipt of other stolen property. Admittedly, a prosecutor still has discretion to charge the receipt of a stolen vehicle under section 496(a). However, "neither the existence of two identical criminal statutes prescribing different levels of punishments, nor the exercise of a prosecutor's discretion in charging under one such statute and not the other, violates equal protection principles. [Citation.]" (People v. Wilkinson, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 838.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.