Is prior sexual assault evidence excluded as unduly prejudicial?

In People v. Harris (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 727, this court identified the following factors relevant to the question whether prior sexual offense evidence should be excluded as unduly prejudicial: (1) The inflammatory nature of the evidence; (2) The probability of confusing the jury with the evidence; (3) The remoteness of the prior offenses; (4) Whether introduction of the evidence would involve an undue consumption of time; and (5) The probative value of the evidence. (Id. at pp. 737-741.)