The issue of who is an “occupier” of premises under the Act is a question of mixed fact and law as it involves the application of a legal standard to the trial judge’s findings of fact: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235. Absent an error of principle or a misapprehension of the evidence giving rise to palpable and overriding error, the trial judge’s findings on this issue must be accorded deference. (i) Is New Orient an “Occupier” under the Act?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.