It was urged I should not exercise my discretion as there was an alternate remedy. There is no alternate remedy, only an appeal. It was also agreed the right of appeal should likewise influence my discretion, following Harelkin v. Univ. of Regina, 1979 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 561, [1979] 3 W.W.R. 676, 26 N.R. 364, but what we deal with in the case at bar is a date of payment: the appeal is to the amount, and I so distinguish the case on the facts. In any event, in view of all the circumstances of this case, and particularly the 4 per cent interest rate, I think it unjust to withhold the remedy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.