Is it unfair to the trial judge and the prosecution to allow defendant to appeal against the peremptory challenge?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Silverio, E054278 (Cal. App. 2012):

It is unfair to the trial judge and to the prosecution to allow defendant to take advantage on appeal of an error that could have been corrected easily at trial. (People v. Saunders, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 590.) Here defendant's counsel acquiesced fully in the procedure followed by the trial court and the prosecutor's exercise of her peremptory challenge against J.H. because of his hearing impairment. Defendant's belated objections to any statutory violations of the jury selection process were waived or forfeited at trial.

Page 9

Other Questions


What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to the benefit of the Court of Appeal's Appeal of Appeal when they are not yet convicted? (California, United States of America)
What is the current standard for a defendant to demonstrate prejudice after properly preserving a claim that the defense used peremptory challenges to cure the erroneous denial of one or more for-cause challenges? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 170.6, subdivision (2) of the Peremptory Challenge Act require counsel to disclose the identity of the assigned judge to counsel before counsel for the moving party learns that the assigning judge has been identified? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a valid challenge to the competency of a prosecution witness at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.