Is it reasonable or reasonable for an attorney of this court to quote portions of a sentence while leaving key qualifiers?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Clark, 452 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2006):

I don't believe that quoting portions of a sentence while leaving out key qualifiers is reasonable conduct for an attorney of this court. I don't believe that making assertions in a brief regarding disputed factual points, without providing a citation to the record, amounts to reasonable attorney conduct. I don't believe that ignoring the context of statements in the recordthe timing, circumstances and purpose amounts to reasonable conduct. In short, I don't believe that it is appropriate or reasonable for a lawyer to pluck a few words from the middle of a sentence and pretend that they say something very different from what they mean in context. This is true of every lawyer who appears before us, but it goes doubly for lawyers who represent the government in criminal cases. See United States v. Kojayan, 8 F.3d 1315, 1323 (9th Cir.1993) ("Prosecutors are subject to constraints and responsibilities that don't apply to other lawyers. While lawyers representing private parties mayindeed, mustdo everything ethically permissible to advance their clients' interests, lawyers representing the government in criminal cases serve truth and justice first." (internal citation omitted)).

Other Questions


When a court departs from the sentencing guidelines, does the court have to indicate a specific reason for the imposition of a sentence different than that described? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a sentencing judge required to state in open court the reasons for the imposition of the sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing a sentence for substantive reasonableness, does the Court have any authority to set aside the sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the sentencing packaging doctrine apply to a case where both a new sentence and a revocation sentence were imposed at the conclusion of a single sentencing proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of "substantive reasonableness" used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether a factor relied on by the sentencing court was unreasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court of appeals remand to a federal district court for resentencing where the sentence was imposed as a possible result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a sentencing court impose a restitutionary sentence on a defendant who is indigent at the time of sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a sentence on appeal, can the Court consider whether the sentence was based on procedural error rather than substantive reasonableness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court exercise its discretionary sentencing authority by sentencing a defendant to a minimum sentence based on the Guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a sentencing court have to state its reasons for imposing a sentence that departs from the applicable guideline range? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.