California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Eskenazi v. Devitt, B207543, B210107, No. BC373090 (Cal. App. 2010):
4. It was proper for the trial court to rule on the motion and not consider the first amended complaint. (Sylmar Air Conditioning v. Pueblo Contracting Services, Inc. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1049 [the filing of an amended pleading does not render a pending anti-SLAPP motion moot].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.