I do not propose to dwell on some of the other arguments counsel have developed, including alternative causation tests. Since Hanke v. Resurfice, (supra), in my view it is not necessary for me to review material contribution tests or arguments addressed about increase in risk. In this "but for" situation those considerations need not be addressed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.