The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Gysels, 974 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1992):
Gysels argues that statements he made in court, used to convict him of criminal contempt, were obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.