California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cook, 134 Cal.Rptr. 484, 64 Cal.App.3d 354 (Cal. App. 1976):
4 '[T]he failure to include information which might otherwise negate a finding of probable cause' constitutes an omission which may be the equivalent of a misstatement. (Theodor v. Superior Court, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 96, n. 11, 104 Cal.Rptr. at p. 239, 501 P.2d at p. 247.) The instant case demonstrates the difficulty of distinguishing between an omission and a misstatement. The affiant's failure to include information concerning the prior warrantless search of defendant's residence--in which the prosecutor participated--is clearly a material omission. However, the possible failure of the affiant to identify this warrantless search as the source of other allegations contained in the affidavit could be construed as either a misstatement or an omission. The wisdom of equating an omission with a misstatement is thus apparent.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.