Is there any precedent for the seriousness and permanence of injuries at bar?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kirby v. B.C.(Attorney General of), 1997 CanLII 2611 (BC SC):
I do not believe that Hilderley v. Dore (February 20, 1996) Vancouver #B941240, relied on by the defendants is representative of a claim involving the seriousness and permanence of the injuries at bar.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a causal link between previous injuries and subsequent injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing whether Jan sustained a serious and prolonged injury as a result of psychological disturbance? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have defence counsel in a personal injury action been advised to take walks as part of their rehabilitation from soft tissue injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will a plaintiff receive a management fee or investment counselling fee in a serious personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
When there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury in the context of a claim for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident, does the claimant have to prove that there is a continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it sufficient to establish that an accepted injury was the most significant cause or accepted injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
