Is an exclusionary clause in a personal injury policy conspicuous?

In Gray v. Zurich, the court found that the exclusionary clause was not conspicuous "since it appears only after a long and complicated page of fine print, and is itself in fine print; its relation to the remaining clauses of the policy and its effect are surely not 'plain and clear.' " (65 Cal.2d at p. 273, 54 Cal.Rptr. at p. 110, 419 P.2d at p. 174.)