Is a trial court's failure to state reasons forfeited?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Thomas, E064888 (Cal. App. 2017):

A trial court's failure to state reasons is forfeited, however, unless raised below. (People v. Boyce (2014) 59 Cal.4th 672, 730.) Here, defense counsel never objected that the trial court had failed to state reasons. Quite the contrary he conceded that the forcible sex offenses were "statutorily required to be run consecutively," and thus, essentially, that no statement of reasons was required.

Defendant notes that forfeiture does not apply when there was no "meaningful opportunity to object . . . ." (People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331, 356.) He argues that defense counsel had no such opportunity, because the trial court interrupted him and told

Page 29

Other Questions


Does a court's specification of reasons for granting a motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds or reasons for the decision to grant the motion, constitute untimely and void? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a trial court's failure to state reasons for sentencing petitioner to two consecutive terms for kidnapping and oral copulation? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the Court's failure to state reasons for not imposing a restitution fine on appeal? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the trial court's exclusion of the defense from the hearing at which the prosecutor stated his reasons for the penalty? (California, United States of America)
If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.