Is a statute restricting judicial review of administrative decisions to the appellate courts within the legislative powers implied or not specified by the Constitution?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from County of Sonoma v. State Energy Resources Conservation etc. Com., 220 Cal.Rptr. 114, 40 Cal.3d 361 (Cal. 1985):
Especially pertinent here are decisions which hold that statutes confining judicial review of administrative decisions to the appellate courts are within [40 Cal.3d 370] legislative powers implied, but not specified, by the Constitution. Loustalot v. Superior Court (1947) 30 Cal.2d 905, 912-913, 186
Page 120
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the severity of discipline imposed by an administrative body in a mandamus proceeding, does the court need to consider the correctness of the decision of the administrative agency rather than that of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing an appeal of a sentence for abuse of abuse of power, how will the appellate court review the sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judicial review of a quasi-judicial administrative decision? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of an appellate court in reviewing a school disciplinary decision on a petition for writ of administrative mandamus? (California, United States of America)
