Is a state criminal conviction an aggravated felony under the Controlled Substances Act?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Sandoval v. Yates, 847 F.3d 697 (9th Cir. 2017):

To determine whether a state criminal conviction is an aggravated felony, we must follow the "categorical approach." See Descamps v. United States , U.S. , 133 S.Ct. 2276, 2281, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013). Under this approach, we "compare the elements of the statute forming the basis of the [petitioner's] conviction with the elements of the generic crimei.e. , the offense as commonly understood." Id. Only if the elements in the petitioner's statute of conviction "are the same as, or narrower than, those of the generic offense" is the petitioner's conviction a categorical match. Id.

Under the categorical approach, we first determine the definition of the generic offensehere, an aggravated felony. This requires us to navigate a "maze of statutory cross-references." Carachuri Rosendo v. Holder , 560 U.S. 563, 567, 130 S.Ct. 2577, 177 L.Ed.2d 68 (2010). We start with the definition of "aggravated felony" as used in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43).

The term "aggravated felony" includes two federal controlled substance offenses relevant to this appeal: (1) "illicit trafficking in a controlled substance," which includes (2) any "drug trafficking crime." 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(B). Only felonies qualify as "illicit trafficking" offenses or "drug trafficking crime[s]." See Lopez v. Gonzales , 549 U.S. 47, 55, 60, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). A "felony" means an offense punishable by more than one year under federal law. See 18 U.S.C. 3559(a)(5) ; see also

[847 F.3d 700]

Moncrieffe v. Holder , U.S. , 133 S.Ct. 1678, 1683, 185 L.Ed.2d 727 (2013) ; Lopez , 549 U.S. at 60, 127 S.Ct. 625 ("In sum, we hold that a state offense constitutes a felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act only if it proscribes conduct punishable as a felony under that federal law.").2

Other Questions


Does a habeas petitioner who has been convicted of a criminal charge in a federal criminal court have to apply to have his conviction reduced to a state conviction or the length of his confinement in a state prison? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When counting criminal convictions for career offender purposes under section 4A1.2 of the Criminal Code, is the criminal conviction of a career offender included in the criminal record calculation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has been convicted of a criminal charge in a federal criminal court have to apply to have his conviction reduced to a state conviction or the length of his sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a revocation of probation imposed on a previous criminal conviction as a result of a new criminal conviction treated as one sentence for purposes of calculating a defendant's criminal history? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a state's expungement of conviction for a criminal conviction under Section 1251(a) of the Criminal Code when it refers to "Prison or Corrections Institute" as "COUNTY JAIL"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What constitutes an aggravated felony for a possession of a controlled substance? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What remedies are available to a state criminal defendant who has been convicted of a federal offence under Section 1983 of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a criminal conviction is the subject of the inquiry, can that criminal conviction also have collateral consequences? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a second conviction for simple drug possession a felony under the Controlled Substances Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.