The following excerpt is from Jones v. San Diego Metro. Transit Sys., Case No.: 3:14-cv-01778-KSC (S.D. Cal. 2017):
A district court must consider several factors when determining whether a settlement agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Torrisi v. Tucson Elec. Power. Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993). These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) the strength of the plaintiffs' case; (2) the risk, expense, complexity, and likely duration of further litigation; (3) the risk of maintaining class action status throughout trial; (4) the amount offered in the proposed settlement agreement; (5) the extent to which discovery has been completed and the stage of the proceedings; (6) the experience and views of counsel; (7) the presence of government participants; and, (8) the reaction of the class members to the proposed settlement. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.