The following excerpt is from Gomez-Sanchez v. Sessions, 887 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2018):
Similarly, in Konou v. Holder, we considered a petitioner's argument that a sentencing enhancement "is not part of the sentence for the conviction" and therefore that the Board and IJ were precluded from considering the enhancement when considering whether a crime was particularly serious. 750 F.3d 1120, 1128 (9th Cir. 2014). We rejected that argument, concluding that a sentencing enhancement is a "type of sentence," which is one of the
[887 F.3d 900]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.