Is a ruling excluding third party culpability evidence abused for abuse of power?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Stewart, A136221 (Cal. App. 2013):
court's ruling excluding third party culpability evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion. [Citation.]" (Id. at pp. 580-581; see also, People v. Hall, supra, 41 Cal.3d at pp. 833-834.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a court's ruling excluding third party culpability evidence reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling excluding third party culpability evidence reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court exclude evidence of third-party culpability for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding third party culpability evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have any power or authority to deny a motion for a new trial motion based on the exclusion of third party culpability evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can third party culpability evidence be used in the context of abuse allegations? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding third party culpability evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts excluded evidence of third party culpability in a murder trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
How will the courts review a trial court's decision to exclude evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
